Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness.
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w57406962 →Countries where authors are citing Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness.
This map shows the geographic impact of Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness.
This network shows the impact of Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness..
About Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness.
This paper, published in 1999, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Karl E. Weick, Kathleen M. Sutcliffe and David Obstfeld covering the research area of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (409 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (352 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (302 citations), Sociology and Political Science (201 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (192 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w57406962.