Orofacial pain : guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management

386 indexed citations
published 2013

Countries where authors are citing Orofacial pain : guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Orofacial pain : guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Orofacial pain : guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Orofacial pain : guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Orofacial pain : guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Orofacial pain : guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Orofacial pain : guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management.

About Orofacial pain : guidelines for assessment, diagnosis, and management

This paper, published in 2013, received 386 indexed citations . Written by Reny de Leeuw and Gary D. Klasser covering the research area of Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Oral Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Complementary and Manual Therapy (313 citations), Physiology (122 citations) and Neurology (117 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w5738150.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026