The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes
- Authors
- Maarten W. van Someren
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w53794172 →Countries where authors are citing The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes
This map shows the geographic impact of The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes
This network shows the impact of The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes.
About The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes
This paper, published in 1994, received 677 indexed citations . Written by Maarten W. van Someren covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (148 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (124 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (94 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w53794172.