Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996.

682 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2007, received 682 indexed citations. Written by David L. Sackett, William Rosenberg, Julie A. Gray, R. Brian Haynes and W. Scott Richardson covering the research area of General Health Professions. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (290 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (195 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (107 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w53635426 →

Countries where authors are citing Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w53635426.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026