W. Scott Richardson
- General Health Professions top 0.05%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 0.2%
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 0.05%
- Economics and Econometrics top 0.5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Co-authors
- R. Brian HaynesWilliam RosenbergDavid L. SackettJ. A. Muir GrayJulie A. GrayLee A. GreenRoman Z. Jaeschkefor the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group
- Topics
- Health Sciences Research and Education (13 papers)Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (10 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Issues, ethics and legal aspectsStatistics, Probability and UncertaintyGeneral Health Professions
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
W. Scott Richardson
45 papers receiving 10.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 202
- General Health Professions 5.2k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 3.2k
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 1.9k
- Economics and Econometrics 1.5k
- Surgery 825
Countries citing papers authored by W. Scott Richardson
This map shows the geographic impact of W. Scott Richardson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Scott Richardson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Scott Richardson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. Scott Richardson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Scott Richardson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Scott Richardson. The network helps show where W. Scott Richardson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Scott Richardson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Scott Richardson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Scott Richardson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Scott Richardson. W. Scott Richardson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 79 | |
| 12 | 184 | |
| 13 | Evidence-based diagnosis: More is needed | 6 |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 105 | |
| 16 | 89 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About W. Scott Richardson
W. Scott Richardson is a scholar working on Family Practice, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 46 papers that have together received 12.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Sciences Research and Education (13 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (10 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (533 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (1.9k citations) and General Health Professions (5.2k citations). W. Scott Richardson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include R. Brian Haynes, William Rosenberg, David L. Sackett, J. A. Muir Gray, Julie A. Gray, Lee A. Green, Roman Z. Jaeschke, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group, Robert Haynes and Gordon H. Guyatt. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Clinical Infectious Diseases and Critical Care Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.