The focussed D* algorithm for real-time replanning
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Anthony Stentz
- Journal
- International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w5082920 →Countries where authors are citing The focussed D* algorithm for real-time replanning
This map shows the geographic impact of The focussed D* algorithm for real-time replanning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The focussed D* algorithm for real-time replanning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The focussed D* algorithm for real-time replanning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The focussed D* algorithm for real-time replanning
This network shows the impact of The focussed D* algorithm for real-time replanning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The focussed D* algorithm for real-time replanning.
About The focussed D* algorithm for real-time replanning
This paper, published in 1995, received 614 indexed citations . Written by Anthony Stentz covering the research area of Computer Networks and Communications, Software and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (510 citations), Aerospace Engineering (286 citations), Artificial Intelligence (179 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (145 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (130 citations). Published in International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w5082920.