Event-related potentials : a methods handbook

590 indexed citations
published 2005
Journal
MIT Press eBooks

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w488906 →

Countries where authors are citing Event-related potentials : a methods handbook

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Event-related potentials : a methods handbook. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Event-related potentials : a methods handbook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Event-related potentials : a methods handbook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Event-related potentials : a methods handbook

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Event-related potentials : a methods handbook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Event-related potentials : a methods handbook.

About Event-related potentials : a methods handbook

This paper, published in 2005, received 590 indexed citations . Written by Todd C. Handy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (490 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (101 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (64 citations), Social Psychology (54 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (39 citations). Published in MIT Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w488906.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact