Learning science in informal environments : people, places, and pursuits

838 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2009, received 838 indexed citations. Written by Philip Bell, Bruce V. Lewenstein, Andrew W. Shouse and Michael Feder covering the research area of Museology, Social Psychology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (360 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (186 citations) and Museology (171 citations). Published in .

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w47530303 →

Countries where authors are citing Learning science in informal environments : people, places, and pursuits

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Learning science in informal environments : people, places, and pursuits. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Learning science in informal environments : people, places, and pursuits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Learning science in informal environments : people, places, and pursuits more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Learning science in informal environments : people, places, and pursuits

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Learning science in informal environments : people, places, and pursuits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Learning science in informal environments : people, places, and pursuits.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w47530303.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026