Computational analysis of present-day American English
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w47438742 →Countries where authors are citing Computational analysis of present-day American English
This map shows the geographic impact of Computational analysis of present-day American English. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Computational analysis of present-day American English with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computational analysis of present-day American English more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Computational analysis of present-day American English
This network shows the impact of Computational analysis of present-day American English. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Computational analysis of present-day American English.
About Computational analysis of present-day American English
This paper, published in 1967, received 6.3k indexed citations . Written by Henry Kučera, W. Nelson Francis, W. F. Twaddell, Mary Lois Marckworth and John B. Carroll covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (3.9k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (2.9k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.8k citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w47438742.