Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills
- Medical Laboratory Technology
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w46457383 →Countries where authors are citing Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills
This map shows the geographic impact of Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills
This network shows the impact of Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills.
About Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non-Technical Skills
This paper, published in 2008, received 676 indexed citations . Written by Rhona Flin, Paul O’Connor and Margaret Crichton covering the research area of Medical Laboratory Technology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Emergency Medical Services (265 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (158 citations) and Physiology (141 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w46457383.