Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review.
Impact in
- Plant Science 549
- Insect Science 300
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w44846958 →Countries where authors are citing Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review.
This map shows the geographic impact of Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review.
This network shows the impact of Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review..
About Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review.
This paper, published in 1991, received 582 indexed citations . Written by K. Sukumar, Michael J. Perich and L. R. Boobar covering the research area of Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (549 citations), Insect Science (300 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (167 citations), Food Science (135 citations) and Molecular Biology (79 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w44846958.