Metodologi penelitian sosial-agama
Impact in
- Education 127
Classified as
- Authors
- Imam SuprayogoTobroni
- Journal
- Andalas University Repository (Andalas University)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w4455222 →Countries where authors are citing Metodologi penelitian sosial-agama
This map shows the geographic impact of Metodologi penelitian sosial-agama. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Metodologi penelitian sosial-agama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Metodologi penelitian sosial-agama more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Metodologi penelitian sosial-agama
This network shows the impact of Metodologi penelitian sosial-agama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Metodologi penelitian sosial-agama.
About Metodologi penelitian sosial-agama
This paper, published in 2001, received 211 indexed citations . Written by Imam Suprayogo and Tobroni covering the research area of Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (127 citations), Sociology and Political Science (121 citations), Cultural Studies (38 citations), Law (20 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (19 citations). Published in Andalas University Repository (Andalas University).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w4455222.