Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Gunther R. Kress
- Journal
- UCL Discovery (University College London)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w306012 →Countries where authors are citing Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame
This map shows the geographic impact of Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame
This network shows the impact of Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame.
About Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame
This paper, published in 2016, received 211 indexed citations . Written by Gunther R. Kress covering the research area of Literature and Literary Theory and Language and Linguistics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Literature and Literary Theory (130 citations), Language and Linguistics (55 citations), Education (54 citations), Speech and Hearing (50 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (38 citations). Published in UCL Discovery (University College London).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w306012.