Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies
- Authors
- Russell J. Dalton
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w42168503 →Countries where authors are citing Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies
This map shows the geographic impact of Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies
This network shows the impact of Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies.
About Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies
This paper, published in 1996, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Russell J. Dalton. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (731 citations), Sociology and Political Science (513 citations) and Communication (376 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w42168503.