End-to-end representation learning for Correlation Filter based tracking

1.0k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2017, received 1.0k indexed citations. Written by Jack Valmadre, Luca Bertinetto, João Henriques, Andrea Vedaldi and Philip H. S. Torr covering the research area of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1.0k citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (319 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (308 citations). Published in Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w13332591 →

Countries where authors are citing End-to-end representation learning for Correlation Filter based tracking

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of End-to-end representation learning for Correlation Filter based tracking. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by End-to-end representation learning for Correlation Filter based tracking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites End-to-end representation learning for Correlation Filter based tracking more than expected).

Fields of papers citing End-to-end representation learning for Correlation Filter based tracking

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of End-to-end representation learning for Correlation Filter based tracking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the End-to-end representation learning for Correlation Filter based tracking.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w13332591.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026