Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Russell J. Dalton
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Russell J. Dalton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Russell J. Dalton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Russell J. Dalton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Russell J. Dalton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Russell J. Dalton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Russell J. Dalton. The network helps show where Russell J. Dalton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Russell J. Dalton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Russell J. Dalton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Russell J. Dalton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Russell J. Dalton. Russell J. Dalton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dalton, Russell J. & Ian McAllister. (2013). Why Parties Change -- or Do They?: Citizen Perceptions of the Partisan Landscape. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
4.
Dalton, Russell J. & Steven Weldon. (2013). Is Direct Democracy a Kinder and Gentler Democracy. 39–62.3 indexed citations
5.
Dalton, Russell J. & Christopher J. Anderson. (2011). Citizens, context, and choice : how context shapes citizens' electoral choices. Oxford University Press eBooks.105 indexed citations
Dalton, Russell J., et al.. (2008). Party politics in East Asia : citizens, elections, and democratic development.1 indexed citations
9.
Kittilson, Miki Caul & Russell J. Dalton. (2008). The Internet and Virtual Civil Society: The New Frontier of Social Capital. eScholarship (California Digital Library).10 indexed citations
10.
Dalton, Russell J., Doh Chull Shin, & Willy Jou. (2007). Popular Conceptions of the Meaning of Democracy: Democratic Understanding in Unlikely Places. eScholarship (California Digital Library).18 indexed citations
Dalton, Russell J., et al.. (2006). Citizens, democracy, and markets around the Pacific rim : congruence theory and political culture. Oxford University Press eBooks.26 indexed citations
13.
Dalton, Russell J., et al.. (2005). The Resource, Structural, and Cultural Bases of Protest. eScholarship (California Digital Library).17 indexed citations
Dalton, Russell J., Susan E. Scarrow, & Bruce E. Cain. (2003). Democracy Transformed?: Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. eScholarship (California Digital Library).165 indexed citations
16.
Dalton, Russell J., Ian McAllister, & Martin Wattenberg. (2003). Democracia e identificação partidária nas sociedades industriais avançadas. Análise Social. 38(167). 295–320.14 indexed citations
17.
Dalton, Russell J.. (1996). Democracy and its Citizens: Patterns of Political Change. eScholarship (California Digital Library).9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.