Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study.
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w41855483 →Countries where authors are citing Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study.
This map shows the geographic impact of Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study.
This network shows the impact of Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study..
About Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study.
This paper, published in 1984, received 471 indexed citations . Written by Richard C. Boronow, C. Paul Morrow, William T. Creasman, Philip J. DiSaia, Steven G. Silverberg, Andrew D. Miller and J A Blessing covering the research area of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Obstetrics and Gynecology (442 citations), Reproductive Medicine (363 citations) and Epidemiology (89 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w41855483.