Detection and resolution of rumours in social media : a survey \n

471 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2018, received 471 indexed citations. Written by Arkaitz Zubiaga, Ahmet Aker, Kalina Bontcheva, Maria Liakata and Rob Procter covering the research area of Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (427 citations), Information Systems (234 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (229 citations). Published in Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w1372054 →

Countries where authors are citing Detection and resolution of rumours in social media : a survey \n

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Detection and resolution of rumours in social media : a survey \n. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Detection and resolution of rumours in social media : a survey \n with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Detection and resolution of rumours in social media : a survey \n more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Detection and resolution of rumours in social media : a survey \n

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Detection and resolution of rumours in social media : a survey \n. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Detection and resolution of rumours in social media : a survey \n.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w1372054.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026