Ungrounded Empires : The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism
- Authors
- Aihwa OngDonald M. Nonini
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w41537900 →Countries where authors are citing Ungrounded Empires : The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism
This map shows the geographic impact of Ungrounded Empires : The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ungrounded Empires : The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ungrounded Empires : The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Ungrounded Empires : The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism
This network shows the impact of Ungrounded Empires : The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ungrounded Empires : The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism.
About Ungrounded Empires : The Cultural Politics of Modern Chinese Transnationalism
This paper, published in 1996, received 472 indexed citations . Written by Aihwa Ong and Donald M. Nonini covering the research area of Demography, Sociology and Political Science and Cultural Studies. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (396 citations), Demography (178 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (93 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w41537900.