Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications: II/ A: Linear Monotone Operators

1.0k indexed citations
published 1989

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w41379106 →

Countries where authors are citing Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications: II/ A: Linear Monotone Operators

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications: II/ A: Linear Monotone Operators. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications: II/ A: Linear Monotone Operators with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications: II/ A: Linear Monotone Operators more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications: II/ A: Linear Monotone Operators

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications: II/ A: Linear Monotone Operators. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications: II/ A: Linear Monotone Operators.

About Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications: II/ A: Linear Monotone Operators

This paper, published in 1989, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Eberhard Zeidler. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Theory and Mathematics (720 citations), Applied Mathematics (376 citations) and Mathematical Physics (224 citations).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w41379106.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026