The Importance of Encoding Versus Training with Sparse Coding and Vector Quantization

314 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2011, received 314 indexed citations. Written by Adam Coates and Andrew Y. Ng covering the research area of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology and Computational Mechanics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (213 citations), Artificial Intelligence (105 citations) and Media Technology (56 citations). Published in International Conference on Machine Learning.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w4019808 →

Countries where authors are citing The Importance of Encoding Versus Training with Sparse Coding and Vector Quantization

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Importance of Encoding Versus Training with Sparse Coding and Vector Quantization. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Importance of Encoding Versus Training with Sparse Coding and Vector Quantization with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Importance of Encoding Versus Training with Sparse Coding and Vector Quantization more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Importance of Encoding Versus Training with Sparse Coding and Vector Quantization

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Importance of Encoding Versus Training with Sparse Coding and Vector Quantization. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Importance of Encoding Versus Training with Sparse Coding and Vector Quantization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w4019808.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026