Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities : new views on measurement issues
- Authors
- G. Reid Lyon
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w39862834 →Countries where authors are citing Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities : new views on measurement issues
This map shows the geographic impact of Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities : new views on measurement issues. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities : new views on measurement issues with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities : new views on measurement issues more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities : new views on measurement issues
This network shows the impact of Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities : new views on measurement issues. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities : new views on measurement issues.
About Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities : new views on measurement issues
This paper, published in 1994, received 496 indexed citations . Written by G. Reid Lyon. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Developmental and Educational Psychology (383 citations), Education (199 citations) and Statistics and Probability (167 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w39862834.