Psychology for language teachers : a social constructivist approach

858 indexed citations
published 1997
Journal
Cambridge University Press eBooks

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w3649652 →

Countries where authors are citing Psychology for language teachers : a social constructivist approach

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Psychology for language teachers : a social constructivist approach. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Psychology for language teachers : a social constructivist approach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychology for language teachers : a social constructivist approach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Psychology for language teachers : a social constructivist approach

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Psychology for language teachers : a social constructivist approach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Psychology for language teachers : a social constructivist approach.

About Psychology for language teachers : a social constructivist approach

This paper, published in 1997, received 858 indexed citations . Written by Marion Williams and Robert Burden. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Language and Linguistics (523 citations), Education (378 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (342 citations). Published in Cambridge University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w3649652.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026