Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w36440037 →Countries where authors are citing Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice
This map shows the geographic impact of Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice
This network shows the impact of Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice.
About Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice
This paper, published in 1998, received 635 indexed citations . Written by Nancy J. Evans, Deanna S. Forney and Florence Guido‐DiBrito covering the research area of Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (432 citations), Social Psychology (173 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (142 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w36440037.