Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications Ed. 3

406 indexed citations
published 2015
Journal
Elsevier eBooks

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w3484748 →

Countries where authors are citing Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications Ed. 3

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications Ed. 3. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications Ed. 3 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications Ed. 3 more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications Ed. 3

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications Ed. 3. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications Ed. 3.

About Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications Ed. 3

This paper, published in 2015, received 406 indexed citations . Written by Jiří Blažek covering the research area of Computational Mechanics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computational Mechanics (295 citations), Aerospace Engineering (136 citations) and Applied Mathematics (74 citations). Published in Elsevier eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w3484748.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026