UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language

823 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1997, received 823 indexed citations. Written by Martin Fowler covering the research area of Software. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (369 citations), Artificial Intelligence (323 citations) and Software (180 citations). Published in CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w32728309 →

Countries where authors are citing UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language more than expected).

Fields of papers citing UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w32728309.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026