The e-puck, a Robot Designed for Education in Engineering

451 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2009, received 451 indexed citations. Written by Francesco Mondada, Michaël Bonani, Christopher M. Cianci, Adam Klaptocz, Stéphane Magnenat, Jean‐Christophe Zufferey, Dario Floreano and Alcherio Martinoli covering the research area of Control and Systems Engineering, Computer Science Applications and Mechanical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Mechanical Engineering (193 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (191 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (118 citations). Published in Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w29469218 →

Countries where authors are citing The e-puck, a Robot Designed for Education in Engineering

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The e-puck, a Robot Designed for Education in Engineering. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The e-puck, a Robot Designed for Education in Engineering with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The e-puck, a Robot Designed for Education in Engineering more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The e-puck, a Robot Designed for Education in Engineering

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The e-puck, a Robot Designed for Education in Engineering. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The e-puck, a Robot Designed for Education in Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w29469218.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026