The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma.

582 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2003, received 582 indexed citations. Written by Ingegerd Hellström, Martha Hayden-Ledbetter, Jeffrey A. Ledbetter, Michèl Schummer, Martin McIntosh, Charles W. Drescher, Nicole Urban and Karl Erik Hellström covering the research area of Immunology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Reproductive Medicine. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Reproductive Medicine (382 citations), Molecular Biology (188 citations) and Surgery (124 citations). Published in PubMed.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w29182540 →

Countries where authors are citing The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w29182540.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026