A review on graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical and fluorescent biosensors
- Journal
- RSC Advances
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1039/c8ra09577a →Countries where authors are citing A review on graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical and fluorescent biosensors
This map shows the geographic impact of A review on graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical and fluorescent biosensors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A review on graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical and fluorescent biosensors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A review on graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical and fluorescent biosensors more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A review on graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical and fluorescent biosensors
This network shows the impact of A review on graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical and fluorescent biosensors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A review on graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical and fluorescent biosensors.
About A review on graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical and fluorescent biosensors
This paper, published in 2019, received 582 indexed citations . Written by Siva Kumar Krishnan, Eric J. Singh, Pragya Singh, M. Meyyappan and Hari Singh Nalwa covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (321 citations), Biomedical Engineering (260 citations) and Molecular Biology (252 citations). Published in RSC Advances.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1039/c8ra09577a.