CENTRAL OLFACTORY CONNEXIONS

329 indexed citations
published 1965
Journal
UCL Discovery (University College London)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w2124855 →

Countries where authors are citing CENTRAL OLFACTORY CONNEXIONS

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of CENTRAL OLFACTORY CONNEXIONS. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by CENTRAL OLFACTORY CONNEXIONS with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CENTRAL OLFACTORY CONNEXIONS more than expected).

Fields of papers citing CENTRAL OLFACTORY CONNEXIONS

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of CENTRAL OLFACTORY CONNEXIONS. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the CENTRAL OLFACTORY CONNEXIONS.

About CENTRAL OLFACTORY CONNEXIONS

This paper, published in 1965, received 329 indexed citations . covering the research area of General Health Professions and Philosophy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sensory Systems (198 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (137 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (102 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (83 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (41 citations). Published in UCL Discovery (University College London).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w2124855.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact