Attitudes Toward Handicapped Students: Professional, Peer and Parent Reactions
- Authors
- Marcia D. Horne
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w19318736 →Countries where authors are citing Attitudes Toward Handicapped Students: Professional, Peer and Parent Reactions
This map shows the geographic impact of Attitudes Toward Handicapped Students: Professional, Peer and Parent Reactions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Attitudes Toward Handicapped Students: Professional, Peer and Parent Reactions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Attitudes Toward Handicapped Students: Professional, Peer and Parent Reactions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Attitudes Toward Handicapped Students: Professional, Peer and Parent Reactions
This network shows the impact of Attitudes Toward Handicapped Students: Professional, Peer and Parent Reactions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Attitudes Toward Handicapped Students: Professional, Peer and Parent Reactions.
About Attitudes Toward Handicapped Students: Professional, Peer and Parent Reactions
This paper, published in 1985, received 92 indexed citations . Written by Marcia D. Horne covering the research area of Education, Law and General Social Sciences. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (53 citations), Education (44 citations) and Safety Research (27 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w19318736.