Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction
Impact in
Classified as
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w1918878574 →Countries where authors are citing Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction
This map shows the geographic impact of Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction
This network shows the impact of Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction.
About Usability Engineering: Scenario-Based Development of Human-Computer Interaction
This paper, published in 2001, received 800 indexed citations . Written by Mary Beth Rosson and John Millar Carroll covering the research area of Information Systems and Human-Computer Interaction. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Human-Computer Interaction (425 citations), Information Systems (217 citations), Sociology and Political Science (148 citations), Artificial Intelligence (113 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (98 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w1918878574.