Using Blogs to Enhance Critical Reflection and Community of Practice
- Authors
- Shih-Hsien Yang
- Journal
- Educational Technology & Society
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w15092625 →Countries where authors are citing Using Blogs to Enhance Critical Reflection and Community of Practice
This map shows the geographic impact of Using Blogs to Enhance Critical Reflection and Community of Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Using Blogs to Enhance Critical Reflection and Community of Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Using Blogs to Enhance Critical Reflection and Community of Practice more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Using Blogs to Enhance Critical Reflection and Community of Practice
This network shows the impact of Using Blogs to Enhance Critical Reflection and Community of Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Using Blogs to Enhance Critical Reflection and Community of Practice.
About Using Blogs to Enhance Critical Reflection and Community of Practice
This paper, published in 2009, received 348 indexed citations . Written by Shih-Hsien Yang covering the research area of Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (253 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (126 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (60 citations). Published in Educational Technology & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w15092625.