Manual for the Child: Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology 1.3k
Classified as
- Journal
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w1483112721 →Countries where authors are citing Manual for the Child: Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile
This map shows the geographic impact of Manual for the Child: Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Manual for the Child: Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Manual for the Child: Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Manual for the Child: Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile
This network shows the impact of Manual for the Child: Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Manual for the Child: Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile.
About Manual for the Child: Behavior Checklist and Revised Child Behavior Profile
This paper, published in 1983, received 3.8k indexed citations . Written by Thomas M. Achenbach and CRAIG S. EDELBROCK covering the research area of Clinical Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (380 citations), Social Psychology (132 citations), Epidemiology (119 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (116 citations). Published in Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w1483112721.