Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors
- Authors
- Brandi GeisingerD. Raj Raman
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w12392394 →Countries where authors are citing Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors
This map shows the geographic impact of Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors
This network shows the impact of Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors.
About Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors
This paper, published in 2013, received 228 indexed citations . Written by Brandi Geisinger and D. Raj Raman covering the research area of Architecture and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Media Technology (110 citations), Safety Research (110 citations) and Education (106 citations). Published in International journal of engineering education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w12392394.