Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey

1.3k indexed citations
published 2015
Journal
Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University)

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w1013420 →

Countries where authors are citing Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey.

About Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey

This paper, published in 2015, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Atılım Güneş Baydin, Barak A. Pearlmutter, Alexey Radul and Jeffrey Mark Siskind covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (656 citations), Artificial Intelligence (310 citations) and Computational Mechanics (285 citations). Published in Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w1013420.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026