Measuring nicotine dependence: A review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire
- Authors
- Karl FagerströmNina Schneider
- Journal
- Journal of Behavioral Medicine
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf00846549 →Countries where authors are citing Measuring nicotine dependence: A review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire
This map shows the geographic impact of Measuring nicotine dependence: A review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Measuring nicotine dependence: A review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Measuring nicotine dependence: A review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Measuring nicotine dependence: A review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire
This network shows the impact of Measuring nicotine dependence: A review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Measuring nicotine dependence: A review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire.
About Measuring nicotine dependence: A review of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire
This paper, published in 1989, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Karl Fagerström and Nina Schneider covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Physiology and Applied Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Physiology (974 citations), Applied Psychology (330 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (306 citations). Published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf00846549.