Differentiation of rat neural stem cells and its relationship with environment.
- Authors
- Chun‐Ming ChenFrank C. Lu
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w27567494 →Countries where authors are citing Differentiation of rat neural stem cells and its relationship with environment.
This map shows the geographic impact of Differentiation of rat neural stem cells and its relationship with environment.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Differentiation of rat neural stem cells and its relationship with environment. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Differentiation of rat neural stem cells and its relationship with environment. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Differentiation of rat neural stem cells and its relationship with environment.
This network shows the impact of Differentiation of rat neural stem cells and its relationship with environment.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Differentiation of rat neural stem cells and its relationship with environment..
About Differentiation of rat neural stem cells and its relationship with environment.
This paper, published in 2004, received 957 indexed citations . Written by Chun‐Ming Chen and Frank C. Lu covering the research area of Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Behavioral Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (270 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (199 citations) and Physiology (193 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w27567494.