Ethical Issues Relating to Scientific Discovery in Exercise Science
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Safety Research
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
- Authors
- James W. NavaltaWhitley J. Stone
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.70252/eycd6235 →Countries where authors are citing Ethical Issues Relating to Scientific Discovery in Exercise Science
This map shows the geographic impact of Ethical Issues Relating to Scientific Discovery in Exercise Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ethical Issues Relating to Scientific Discovery in Exercise Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethical Issues Relating to Scientific Discovery in Exercise Science more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Ethical Issues Relating to Scientific Discovery in Exercise Science
This network shows the impact of Ethical Issues Relating to Scientific Discovery in Exercise Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Ethical Issues Relating to Scientific Discovery in Exercise Science.
About Ethical Issues Relating to Scientific Discovery in Exercise Science
This paper, published in 2019, received 531 indexed citations . Written by James W. Navalta and Whitley J. Stone covering the research area of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Safety Research and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (277 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (133 citations) and Physiology (111 citations). Published in International journal of exercise science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.70252/eycd6235.