Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition
- Authors
- Theodore V. HiggsStephen Krashen
- Journal
- Modern Language Journal
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/328293 →Countries where authors are citing Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition
This map shows the geographic impact of Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition
This network shows the impact of Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition.
About Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition
This paper, published in 1983, received 3.1k indexed citations . Written by Theodore V. Higgs and Stephen Krashen covering the research area of Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language and Literature and Literary Theory. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Language and Linguistics (2.4k citations), Literature and Literary Theory (1.6k citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.5k citations). Published in Modern Language Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/328293.