Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited

1.2k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2003, received 1.2k indexed citations. Written by Mary J. Benner and Michael L. Tushman covering the research area of Ocean Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (856 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (270 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (217 citations). Published in Academy of Management Review.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/30040711 →

Countries where authors are citing Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/30040711.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026