Identity Salience and Psychological Centrality: Equivalent, Overlapping, or Complementary Concepts?

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 719 indexed citations. Written by Sheldon Stryker and Richard T. Serpe covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (497 citations), Gender Studies (186 citations) and Social Psychology (174 citations). Published in Social Psychology Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/2786972 →

Countries where authors are citing Identity Salience and Psychological Centrality: Equivalent, Overlapping, or Complementary Concepts?

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Identity Salience and Psychological Centrality: Equivalent, Overlapping, or Complementary Concepts?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Identity Salience and Psychological Centrality: Equivalent, Overlapping, or Complementary Concepts? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Identity Salience and Psychological Centrality: Equivalent, Overlapping, or Complementary Concepts? more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Identity Salience and Psychological Centrality: Equivalent, Overlapping, or Complementary Concepts?

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Identity Salience and Psychological Centrality: Equivalent, Overlapping, or Complementary Concepts?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Identity Salience and Psychological Centrality: Equivalent, Overlapping, or Complementary Concepts?.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2786972.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026