ROLE OF PROT+G+ PERSONALITY IN RECEIPT OF MENTORING AND CAREER SUCCESS.

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 516 indexed citations. Written by Daniel B. Turban and Thomas W. Dougherty covering the research area of Education, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (336 citations), Education (213 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (210 citations). Published in Academy of Management Journal.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/256706 →

Countries where authors are citing ROLE OF PROT+G+ PERSONALITY IN RECEIPT OF MENTORING AND CAREER SUCCESS.

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of ROLE OF PROT+G+ PERSONALITY IN RECEIPT OF MENTORING AND CAREER SUCCESS.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by ROLE OF PROT+G+ PERSONALITY IN RECEIPT OF MENTORING AND CAREER SUCCESS. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ROLE OF PROT+G+ PERSONALITY IN RECEIPT OF MENTORING AND CAREER SUCCESS. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing ROLE OF PROT+G+ PERSONALITY IN RECEIPT OF MENTORING AND CAREER SUCCESS.

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of ROLE OF PROT+G+ PERSONALITY IN RECEIPT OF MENTORING AND CAREER SUCCESS.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the ROLE OF PROT+G+ PERSONALITY IN RECEIPT OF MENTORING AND CAREER SUCCESS..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/256706.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026