Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model1
- Journal
- MIS Quarterly
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/249498 →Countries where authors are citing Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model1
This map shows the geographic impact of Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model1. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model1 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model1 more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model1
This network shows the impact of Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model1. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model1.
About Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model1
This paper, published in 1997, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Magid Igbaria, Paul Cragg and Angèle Cavaye covering the research area of Information Systems and Management, Communication and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems and Management (919 citations), Sociology and Political Science (521 citations) and Communication (249 citations). Published in MIS Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/249498.