Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish Knitwear Producers

679 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1995, received 679 indexed citations. Written by Joseph F. Porac, Howard Thomas, Fiona Wilson, Douglas Paton and Alaina Kanfer covering the research area of Strategy and Management, Plant Science and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (460 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (210 citations) and Accounting (110 citations). Published in Administrative Science Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/2393636 →

Countries where authors are citing Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish Knitwear Producers

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish Knitwear Producers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish Knitwear Producers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish Knitwear Producers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish Knitwear Producers

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish Knitwear Producers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Rivalry and the Industry Model of Scottish Knitwear Producers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2393636.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026