The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations.
- Authors
- Debra MeyersonNils Brunsson
- Journal
- Administrative Science Quarterly
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/2393445 →Countries where authors are citing The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations.
This map shows the geographic impact of The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations.
This network shows the impact of The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations..
About The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions, and Actions in Organizations.
This paper, published in 1991, received 524 indexed citations . Written by Debra Meyerson and Nils Brunsson. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (166 citations), Sociology and Political Science (162 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (138 citations). Published in Administrative Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2393445.