Large Corporate Failures as Downward Spirals
- Journal
- Administrative Science Quarterly
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/2392853 →Countries where authors are citing Large Corporate Failures as Downward Spirals
This map shows the geographic impact of Large Corporate Failures as Downward Spirals. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Large Corporate Failures as Downward Spirals with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Large Corporate Failures as Downward Spirals more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Large Corporate Failures as Downward Spirals
This network shows the impact of Large Corporate Failures as Downward Spirals. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Large Corporate Failures as Downward Spirals.
About Large Corporate Failures as Downward Spirals
This paper, published in 1988, received 605 indexed citations . Written by Donald C. Hambrick and Richard A. D'Aveni covering the research area of Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Accounting. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Accounting (334 citations), Strategy and Management (246 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (155 citations), Economics and Econometrics (124 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (78 citations). Published in Administrative Science Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2392853.