Threat Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis

2.6k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1981, received 2.6k indexed citations. Written by Barry M. Staw and Jane E. Dutton covering the research area of Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Strategy and Management (980 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (905 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (516 citations). Published in Administrative Science Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/2392337 →

Countries where authors are citing Threat Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Threat Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Threat Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Threat Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Threat Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Threat Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Threat Rigidity Effects in Organizational Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2392337.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026