Bargains and Ripoffs: A Model of Monopolistically Competitive Price Dispersion

706 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1977, received 706 indexed citations. Written by Steven C. Salop and Joseph E. Stiglitz covering the research area of Marketing and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Marketing (484 citations), Economics and Econometrics (444 citations) and Strategy and Management (237 citations). Published in The Review of Economic Studies.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/2296903 →

Countries where authors are citing Bargains and Ripoffs: A Model of Monopolistically Competitive Price Dispersion

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bargains and Ripoffs: A Model of Monopolistically Competitive Price Dispersion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bargains and Ripoffs: A Model of Monopolistically Competitive Price Dispersion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bargains and Ripoffs: A Model of Monopolistically Competitive Price Dispersion more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Bargains and Ripoffs: A Model of Monopolistically Competitive Price Dispersion

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Bargains and Ripoffs: A Model of Monopolistically Competitive Price Dispersion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Bargains and Ripoffs: A Model of Monopolistically Competitive Price Dispersion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2296903.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026