A Multilevel Model of the Social Distribution of High School Achievement
- Authors
- Valerie E. LeeAnthony S. Bryk
- Journal
- Sociology of Education
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.2307/2112866 →Countries where authors are citing A Multilevel Model of the Social Distribution of High School Achievement
This map shows the geographic impact of A Multilevel Model of the Social Distribution of High School Achievement. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Multilevel Model of the Social Distribution of High School Achievement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Multilevel Model of the Social Distribution of High School Achievement more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Multilevel Model of the Social Distribution of High School Achievement
This network shows the impact of A Multilevel Model of the Social Distribution of High School Achievement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Multilevel Model of the Social Distribution of High School Achievement.
About A Multilevel Model of the Social Distribution of High School Achievement
This paper, published in 1989, received 476 indexed citations . Written by Valerie E. Lee and Anthony S. Bryk covering the research area of Sociology and Political Science and Education. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Education (395 citations), Sociology and Political Science (97 citations) and Safety Research (41 citations). Published in Sociology of Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/2112866.